Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (18-938)
A bankruptcy court’s order unreservedly denying relief from the automatic stay of creditor debt-collection efforts outside the bankruptcy forum, see 11 U. S. C. §362(a), is final and immediately appealable under 28 U. S. C. §158(a).
Turkey: Rewards Offered for Help in Cracking Down on Terrorists
Intelligence activities; National security; Terrorism – On August 31, 2015, Turkish authorities issued a new regulation to reward persons who assist in the capture of perpetrators of terrorism. Similar payments for information on terrorist crimes and suspects have been made available in… The Global Legal Monitor from the Law Library of Congress covers legal news and developments worldwide.
Need A Witness For Your Mail-In Ballot? New Pandemic Lawsuits Challenge Old Rules
Among the main targets are requirements such as signing a ballot envelope, or getting a witness or notary to sign it. Small details matter a lot and could affect the outcome in November.
Rotkiske v. Klemm (18-328)
Absent the application of an equitable doctrine, the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act’s statute of limitations for bringing a private civil action against debt collectors who engage in certain prohibited practices, 15 U. S. C. §1692k(d), begins to run when the alleged violation occurs, not when it is discovered. Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (18-938) Aviku Law Resources Via https://www.aviku.com/uncategorized/ritzen-group-inc-v-jackson-masonry-llc-18-938/
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorGreen Mountain Law Firm SEO Archives
February 2022
Categories |