New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City of New York (18-280)
Petitioners’ claim for declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the City’s old rule on transporting firearms is moot, and any claim for damages with respect to that rule may be addressed in the first instance by the Court of Appeals and the District Court on remand.
Selena Quintanilla's family takes legal action after Texas man plans Trump event at her statue
A man who put a Make America Great Again hat on a Selena statue in Texas faces legal action from the late songstress' family for allegedly using her …
Christopher Columbus Langdell, Black Lives Matter and Legal Education
Eduardo R.C. Capulong, a professor at CUNY School of Law in Long Island City, New York, discusses the how legal academia is rooted in white …
Thole v. U. S. Bank N. A. (17-1712)
Because petitioners, whose defined-benefit retirement plan guarantees them a fixed payment each month regardless of the plan’s value or its fiduciaries’ investment decisions, have no concrete stake in this Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 lawsuit against the fiduciaries, they lack Article III standing.
The Occupation of the West Bank and the Crime of Apartheid: Legal Opinion
The conclusion of this legal opinion is that the crime against humanity of apartheid is being committed in the West Bank. The perpetrators are Israelis, … New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City of New York (18-280) Via http://www.dot-net-search.com/uncategorized/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-assn-inc-v-city-of-new-york-18-280/
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorGreen Mountain Law Firm SEO Archives
February 2022
Categories |